AUXILIARY RESPONSE OF A FLOATING RUNWAY

ANAND JAISHWAL

Abstract


When outlining a skimming air terminal we have to address the auxiliary
reaction both by sea waves and element loads, for example, the arrival/take
off of a plane. Since such issues are not helpful for physical displaying and
test approval because of their size and speeds included, numerical
investigation is an acknowledged standard. However customary intends to
think about basic reactions utilizing a three dimensional runway with time
shifting element burdens is numerically troublesome and tedious. The
investigation is made less difficult by expecting the airplane terminal to be a
straightforward, limitlessly long pillar, given by a one dimensional
Timoshenko-Mindlin plate condition, in contact with the water surface. In
building up this expression, a Fourier change in space in wave number area
is used instead of utilizing the wave proliferation technique to decrease the
investigation to a substructure. On breaking down, the basic reaction is
seen as nearby pinnacles radiating from the purpose of load application
which moves in a curvilinear way with expanding rate of the plane. The area
of these pinnacles from the earlier is however not achievable.

Full Text:

Untitled

References


Watanabe, E. what's more, Utsunomiya, T. (1996): Transient Response Analysis of a

VLFS Airplane Landing, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Very Large

Floating Structures, Hayama, Japan, pp. 243-247.

Kim, J. W. what's more, Webster, W. C. (1998): The Drag of an Airplane Taking off

from a Floating Runway, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 3, pp. 76-

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02492562 Ohmatsu, S. (1998): Numerical

Calculation of Hydroelastic Behavior of VLFS in Time Domain, Proceedings of the

International Conference on Hydroelasticity in Marine Technology, Fukuoka, Japan,

pp. 89–98.

Endo, H. what's more, Yago, K. (1998): Time History Response of a Large Floating

Structure Subjected to Dynamic Load, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of

Japan, Vol. 186, pp. 369-376.

Endo, H. (2000): The Behavior of a VLFS and an Airplane During Takeoff/Landing

Run in Wave Condition, Marine Structures, Vol. 13, No.4-5, pp. 477-491.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(00)00020-4

Yeung, R. W. what's more, Kim, J. W. (2000): Effect of Translating Load on a

Floating Plate-Structural Drag and Plate Deformation, Journal of Fluids and

Structures, Vol. 14, pp. 993-1011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jfls.2000.0307 Lee,

D. H. what's more, Choi, H. S. (2003): Transient Hydroelastic Response of Very

Large Floating Structures by FE-BE Hybrid Method, Proceedings of the International

Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, pp. 100-105.

Kashiwagi, M. (2004): Transient Responses of a VLFS During Landing and Take-off

of an Airplane, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 14-23.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00773-003-0168-0

Fleischer, D. furthermore, Park, S. K. (2004): Plane Hydroelastic Beam Vibrations

Due to Uniformly Moving One Axle Vehicle, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 3,

pp. 585-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00518-2 Kyoung, J. H.,

Hong, S. Y. also, Kim, B. W. (2006): FEM for Time Domain Analysis of Hydroelastic


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.